22 July 2007 @ 03:26 pm
my review for hp7  
I really tried getting into it. It didn't work.


Overall, the plot was trite and cliched. Halfway into it I was still bored; I kept hoping for something to happen, hoping to be touched or surprised or shocked or saddened or at least involved in a book that had so much hype surrounding it. Compared to how long I waited for the endign and how excited I was at finally getting it, going through such a tedious and repetitive plot felt so anticlimactic and disappointing.

I'm not saying the book is entirely bad - there were few good parts, like Snape's backstory and oh, that's the only thing that I liked.

Everything else was just lame.

Deathly Hallows - Not sure if it's just me, but I thought this was so unnecessary. We could have done without it and just focused on Harry finding the Horcruxes and on the battle at the end. I was so hoping that in the process of killing Voldemort he would be able to grow up emotionally and stop being so damn angsty. There's honestly no difference between Harry at the beginning of the book and Harry at the end. Heck, I don't even think he's any different from GOF.

Houses - I think someone's mentioned this, but I was really surprised when none of the Slytherins stayed behind to fight. Just because the Slytherins are cunning or sly or ambitious doesn't make them entirely evil or immoral. You're telling me that the other houses have not a single indecent streak in them? I am sure that there are Slytherins who, while being cunning and ambitious, would never have been able to stomach the thought of Hogwarts being destroyed or their friends killed. One bad egg doesn't represent the entire carton. What right is it of McGonagall to threaten all of them out? Once again somebody's mentioned this, but like the houses, human nature has no black or white and one can be good and evil at the same time.I was disappointed that JKR, someone who's built such a successful empire out of HP, would shoot herself down like that.

Character Deaths - Totally predictable. When Tonks got pregnant I kept praying that JKR wouldn't kill her off just for the angst factor, but surprisingly - wow she did! And Lupin too! And they best part is, they died together! Peacefully! I was hoping for at least a tiny bit of realism here, like Tonks surviving while Lupin dies or vice versa, or at least if they were to die together, die in agony because for God's sake, they are in the middle of the battle. The thing I don't get is, will it really make the story more emotional with major character deaths? I felt it'd be more impressionable for instance, if Lupin were rendered blind and he'd never be able to see (literally) his son grow up . Or if Tonks had a miscarriage in t he middle of the battle. But then again, this is a children's book we're talking about.

Which reminds me, why the hell wasn't any of the trio touched? Compare the causalities on Harry's side (I'm not talking about half of the fighters dying, I'm referring to the ones who died that Harry made a point of mentioning, like Fred, Lupin and Tonks - obviously for him to mention it they must matter more) VS the magnitude and scale of the battle, the amount of people who died on the good side really didn't have that much impact. Especially when nearing the end of the battle, there were still many familiar faces around. It's so unrealistic. I'd have expected more familiar characters dying because even though the students are good they are still nothing compared to the Death Eaters, who are skilled killers with years of experience.

Harry "Rises Again" - Excuse me? Which page of the Bible was this ripped from? Maybe that explains why Voldie is such a crackpot. I would go crazy too, if my enemy rises from the dead over and over again on the basis that - sorry I'm not sure if I got this part right -many people loved him. *takes a deep breath* SERIOUSLY HARRY, YOU'RE NOT JESUS. IF YOU DIE, STAY DEAD. YOUR DEATH WOULD BE A MUCH BETTER ENDING THAN THE CRINGE-WORTHY ENDING IN LATER CHAPTERS.

Okay, now that's out of my system, the rest of the chapter left me really confused. What the hell was the screaming/mutant baby about? Is it really necessary? And am I the only one who wanted to slap Dumbledore for spending an entire chapter backstorying more unnecessary backstory?

Draco Malfoy - I was hoping that JKR would develop his character more, but like Dudley and Petunia (who had such a potential redeemable character towards the end) he just faded away.

The epilogue - Albus Severus? James and Lily? Really? No, really? To think if they had one kid he/she'd be called James Lily Albus Severus Potter. I bet that's the reason why they had 3 - to fit in an obituary. :) And seriously, Ginny FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS. Remember Fred? Your brother Fred? He died too! Or was he not significant enough? Oh wait, I bet you're pregnant again right? Now that makes more sense. And the last line? Something about Harry's scar no longer hurting? "All was well"? Are you kidding me?



PS: Sorry if this post offended anyone but these are just my honest opinions and I'm all up for discussion. Also, some of the facts may not be accurate because I don't have the book with me; I'm just remembering them off the top of my head.
 
 
( 57 spoilers — Spoil Us )
bugland: slytherin demon by simply_blah[info]alasandalack on July 22nd, 2007 09:09 am (UTC)
precisely correct on all points. *is gagged to death by JKR's forklift*
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 09:27 am (UTC)
Thank you. :) I was half-afraid I'd be sporked to death for disliking the book. (Not saying I don't like HP, but the obsession is insane.)
(no subject) - [info]seikachan on July 22nd, 2007 01:01 pm (UTC) (Expand)
Chrissie: Luna holding Harry's hand[info]butterfly_xxc on July 22nd, 2007 09:15 am (UTC)
What the hell was the screaming/mutant baby about? Is it really necessary?

I thought it to be Voldemort after he was finally killed, trapped, again not entirely human after ripping his soul apart, in a state of between life and death. My basis for that is Harry saying, I think it was, "I've seen what you become" after he returns from King's Cross.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 09:23 am (UTC)
Hmm yeah, I've read some theories about it and that's probably the most likely explanation. Though I still remain staunch on the fact that there could be a better metaphor for Voldemort's split soul and a better way of resolving/finding out about it, apart from Harry getting lucky again (sorry, I just don't buy the whole "my soul in your soul and your soul has my mother's love" excuse)

But thanks for clarifying. :)
(no subject) - [info]butterfly_xxc on July 22nd, 2007 09:39 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 10:27 am (UTC) (Expand)
Gehayi: meh (yavi_no_hikari)[info]gehayi on July 22nd, 2007 09:21 am (UTC)
I agree with you on every single point. Bless you for saying it.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 09:26 am (UTC)
Seriously. I've read better.
She's not the Messiah, she's a very[info]naughtydolphin on July 22nd, 2007 09:42 am (UTC)
I think you're taking it way too seriously. It's a kids book, remember.

I find allusions to Harry being Jesus highly amusing.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 10:03 am (UTC)
I think you're taking my review way too seriously. I was being sarcastic.

It being a kid's book doesn't excuse poor characterisation and bad planning.
(no subject) - [info]naughtydolphin on July 22nd, 2007 10:33 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:05 am (UTC) (Expand)
[info]moordeb on July 22nd, 2007 09:44 am (UTC)
You're exactly right. My main problem - I could handle the occasionally shoddy writing - was that the plot was predictable.

See, I was expecting JKR to go somewhere fanfiction writers wouldn't. She did that with the deaths of Cedric, Sirius and Dumbledore. I suppose I expected to see what we thought we knew twisted in such a way that it made sense in a new way, and the death of at least one main main character that would leave us without a completely happy, everybody-partners-off ending. Something realistic, I guess.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 10:36 am (UTC)
You said it better than I did. A sad ending doesn't mean a bad ending.

I was really hoping that despite all the rumours and predictions, JKR would still be able to surprise us with a different take on the story, but all I got was one long windy fanfic of predictable storylines and passable writing style. But I guess it's really hard when there's millions of people anticipating your book and all of them drawing their own conclusions.
(Anonymous) on July 22nd, 2007 09:56 am (UTC)
I completely agree with your review.

On the character deaths I think Rowling just didn't have the guts to touch the trio and get tons of hate mail. And you're right, the whole theory about why and how Harry gets protection against Voldemort has changed so many times and gone so far fetched, that it's no longer believable. I laughed so much when Harry "resuscitated" :P
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:25 am (UTC)
Me too. I was more annoyed than anything. If you're dead, remain dead! Being alive again just takes away the fun of being dead. ;)
Lady Aidil: enigma[info]lady_aidil on July 22nd, 2007 10:03 am (UTC)
I agree with every word.
So much potential that still is in all HP previous books wasted in ludicrously lame story with big plot-holes,ultra-conservative views(stupid House rivalry,conserved prejudices even after 20 years,"little women"heaven with husbands and kids as the ultimate goal in life-"all was well"?!!!!),meaningless deaths(Hedwig-WTF?!)
I like some parts,but she destroyed my two beloved characters-Remus-OOC more than in a bad fanfiction and Severus-I don`t buy this Harlequin hero crying after teenage crush-where is cruel bastard with brilliant mind and razor-sharp tongue?!!!You`re right-the only parts I like the most are from his tale-where I see glimpses of my old Snape(especially with Dumbledore when he asked Snape to kill him)
And Slytherins-they all are bad-even first years?!!!What-they have mutant genes?!Oh sorry,we have one -Slughorn(what a relief!)
Love you for all you wrote :)
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 01:43 pm (UTC)
Aww, I really liked the Severus backstory. It's the only part in the book that made me tear up.

I don't mind the meaningless deaths because it adds to the realism and how the war's messed up the world, etc, but yeah Hedwig's death didn't do for me at all. After 2 years of not reading Harry Potter Hedwig's death didn't really affect me too much. It was more like "Whoa, did she just implode? Okay, NEXT!" kind of feeling. Not sure if that's what JKR was going for but it was all happening so fast that it could have been easily missed. (Like Lupin and Tonks' deaths - some completely missed that part)

But yeah, there were a lot of bad characterisation and poor planning (read the 1st and last book - they're almost non-related) on JKR's part. Planning 7 books couldn't have been easy but the fact is, I didn't get the planning in the first place. More like she was adding things that didn't make sense as she went along, spinning more and more plot (and plot holes) that the story felt like a whole jumbled mess.

PS: I love love love Snape. I don't think the Slytherins are all bad. Give them a chance to redeem themselves, JKR! But let's leave the Sorting Hat-encourages-discrimination-and-prejudice debate to another day...
johnny x: fry[info]viva_suspenders on July 22nd, 2007 10:34 am (UTC)
The point of the deathly hallows was to point out the crucial character flaws in Voldemort and Dumbledore. They had a purpose, just not the most obvious one. I don't know if you read the part where Harry chose the horcruxes as more important to pursue, but that was a pretty important turning point in the plot. I guess the hallows represented greed, longing for power, etc, which Voldemort had in excess, and we just learned, in this book, that Dumbledore had as well.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 02:20 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I got that. I just felt there should be a less complicated way of imparting this knowledge, more focus on other plot points (instead of adding new ones) and work on characterisation in general.
athenalma[info]athenalma on July 22nd, 2007 10:35 am (UTC)
I'm totally with you. I thought the way Tonks and Lupin were killed was unnecesary drama added, specially when none of the teenage characters (the trio and Ginny, who Harry is meant to be in love with) is hurt in the big battle, and the end is so "happy".

But the chapter about Snape is worth reading after all :D
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:21 am (UTC)
Totally agree. He was such a cute kid! Makes me want to kick James' ass all the more. He's so obnoxious.
(no subject) - [info]athenalma on July 22nd, 2007 02:01 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(Anonymous) on July 22nd, 2007 10:38 am (UTC)

Character Deaths - Totally predictable. When Tonks got pregnant I kept praying that JKR wouldn't kill her off just for the angst factor, but surprisingly - wow she did! And Lupin too! And they best part is, they died together! Peacefully! I was hoping for at least a tiny bit of realism here, like Tonks surviving while Lupin dies or vice versa, or at least if they were to die together, die in agony because for God's sake, they are in the middle of the battle. The thing I don't get is, will it really make the story more emotional with major character deaths? I felt it'd be more impressionable for instance, if Lupin were rendered blind and he'd never be able to see (literally) his son grow up . Or if Tonks had a miscarriage in t he middle of the battle. But then again, this is a children's book we're talking about.


You complain about clichés, and then want the story to be horribly clichéd?

It's good that they died that way. It avoided unneccessairy drama. Sorry that the novel didn't turn as emo as you liked.


Also lol at the so many survivors, unrealistic lololol of yours. War does not work that way, sorry kiddo.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 10:53 am (UTC)
I'm going to skip over the unnecessary parts of this comment and get to the point.

"You complain about clichés, and then want the story to be horribly clichéd?" - And dying peacefully, side by side wasn't? So it's either death in each other's arms or nothing? War doesn't work that way, sorry to say. Maybe the examples I used wasn't the best, but there are better ways of resolving the story without making it seem as if JKR were just throwing in random characters to kill to add to the angst factor.
(no subject) - [info]rachie13 on July 22nd, 2007 12:59 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 01:33 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rachie13 on July 22nd, 2007 03:37 pm (UTC) (Expand)
[info]monkshood_hp on July 22nd, 2007 10:52 am (UTC)
You are right...
Even though I like the book these things do bother me. I don't mind Harry/Ginny having 3 kids -- women can have kids and a career (though it kills them eventually!)

You nailed what's wrong with Albus Sevvie -- at this rate, the entire wizarding world will all share the same 3 names.

I think someone's mentioned this, but I was really surprised when none of the Slytherins stayed behind to fight.

Precisely, so when she said house unity, she really meant 3 houses uniting against Slytherins ...

Sorry Teddy, but I think you are a last minute accident -- in a literary sense. Once she decided to kill off Lupin and Tonks in a moment of bloodlust, Teddy was brought in speedily so the parents could 'live on'.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:14 am (UTC)
Re: You are right...
I think it was the opposite. His parents died so he could live for the angst. Oh, the drama!
(no subject) - [info]monkshood_hp on July 22nd, 2007 11:22 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:25 am (UTC) (Expand)
addicted_me[info]addicted_me on July 22nd, 2007 10:53 am (UTC)
Thank you for writing it. I totally agree with every word you said. I was forcing myself to read it till the end. And it's me- who was a truly HP fan. I really enjoyed previous books. But she even ruined those 6 books for me. I cannot even pretend there are no 7th book, to reread first six of them. Because the shadow of lame-written DH will remind me. "Always". U-huh.

I wonder, all those folks, with whom we were spending last 2 years on HP-lexicon forum, I bet they all will be happy with the book, and excuse all plot-holes and OCC's etc. Thats sad too.

new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 11:20 am (UTC)
Thank you. :)

I was quite hesitant about posting this review because I really don't like silly internet flame wars and was afraid that rabid HP fans might bite off my head for disagreeing. But I'm glad there are so many mature and rational commenters here though.

About your point - isn't it disappointing how the story had so much going for it and she had to kill it off with such a bad ending? I don't know about you, but I always felt that the HP books were disjointed and messy, like there was no single plot flowing through the story and it was just bits and pieces of accidents thrown together to form a series.
(no subject) - [info]pathology_doc on July 22nd, 2007 02:51 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 03:13 pm (UTC) (Expand)
Marian Dalton: crap[info]crazyjane13 on July 22nd, 2007 11:32 am (UTC)
Nope, you're right, it sucked the mop in sooooo many ways.

My review was even nastier (but I copped out and put it in my own LJ).

new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 01:34 pm (UTC)
Awesome! You wrote a review, too. I'm definitely gonna read it after replying to the comments. :D
(no subject) - [info]crazyjane13 on July 23rd, 2007 12:17 am (UTC) (Expand)
Rave: Kyo - shoulder[info]ravanna on July 22nd, 2007 11:51 am (UTC)
Thank you so much for saying this. When I got it and started reading, it was nowhere near the half-blood-prince since I absolutely felt no suspense rising in any way; most of the plot was just so constructed and them sitting in that damn tent doing Nothing was freaking me out after a couple of chapters – I there had to agree with Ron; I thought they would simply DO more.
For the hell of characters, damn Rowling for letting Snape die this way, or let Draco be mentioned so softly we could talk about a completely different character. The last chapter, as much as it pleased most of the readers in my LJ, made me feel rather…unsatisfied; it was so well-looking, so shiny and perfect and I always had to think of Mary Sues and Gary Stues and that aaalll went well~
I’m absolutely agreeing with you – but I think it always IS hard to end a serial, and one as huge as this, with so many people waiting for a good end, it was hard to pick one
(but The Deathly Hallows, being mentioned that way, a whole book with a search being stopped because of another search, suspense and also plot losing itself in the book and the END of Harry coming back and end it like BANG, oh hell, I don’t know) but well, after all, since there was so MUCH to DO at the end of HBP, I am seriously disappointed.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 02:39 pm (UTC)
I knew the ending before I read the book but I kept hoping that the spoilers weren't real. No way in hell would JKR ruin her series with so. much. cheese. But she did. And it tastes horrible.
bips100[info]bips100 on July 22nd, 2007 12:33 pm (UTC)
I was going to write something in the same vein but i'm glad you beat me to it... bec all i can read everywhere (including notable book ctitics in major newspapers) is how faaaabbbbulous this epic is... *gags*
I agree with every single of your point... Although I did like the whole myth about the deathly hallows but just stuffing them in one book with all the horcruxes ? .... over the top.... The book already has 10 years worth of questions to answer and mysteries to solve... why put in something new ?
Also, seems like the unforgivables are not all that unconquerable ... just some foolish wand waving and everyone from harry to hermione to crabbe can crucio/ imperio...
Urghhhh... I can go on and on about the plot holes but i'll save that all for the final review on my blog :)
Btw, what are your thoughts on the trio... I felt they were all over the place.. when did hermione become a cry baby, harry so harmonal and ron a don juan demarco ?... is anyone even worried abt saving the world ?...very weak characterisation... my 2 cents
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 02:13 pm (UTC)
I liked the myth; just don't see how it fit into the story. Like it was thrown in for no apparent reason just to instill moral values in our hero and fluff up the plot.

The book already has 10 years worth of questions to answer and mysteries to solve... why put in something new ? Precisely. None of the books linked up for me. The only running theme I see is to destroy Voldy, and the Horcruxes were what, only introduced in the 6th book?

Also, seems like the unforgivables are not all that unconquerable ... just some foolish wand waving and everyone from harry to hermione to crabbe can crucio/ imperio... LOL, for real.

"Btw, what are your thoughts on the trio..." I agree on the weak characterisation part. Harry's either angsty or angry, Hermione's bordering on anxiety disorder and Ron has some major confidence hurdles to overcome. They look like they all have obsession or self-esteem issues. Saving the world ain't gonna get rid of those problems. I was hoping that the trio I read at the end of the series would be different from the ones at the beginning - ie, more mature, thoughtful, less selfish, less emo. But from start to finish all I see are 3 flat characters with intense mood swings who needs to take a leaf out of Snape's book and learn the meaning of growing up and sacrifice.

(I was really irritated about their attitudes at Fleur's wedding. Someone close to you is getting married, surely you can be a little more supportive and tolerant?)

Another problem I had ia with Ginny. I don't like her. When did she go from starstruck little girl to the new age feminist? Did I miss the part when she grew up? I kind of expected more characterisation for her, but all I see is a snobby girl who disses people for the heck of it. Honestly, I don't know what Fleur did to her but calling her Phlegm for no apparent reason is rude. And the part in DH where Cho wanted to accompany Harry and Ginny said Luna instead? I wanted to throttle her. If my boyfriend's about to die in a war cheating's the last thing I'll worry about. Her insecurities make me wonder how they lasted till the epilogue.
(no subject) - [info]bips100 on July 22nd, 2007 03:09 pm (UTC) (Expand)
evespikey[info]evespikey on July 22nd, 2007 01:39 pm (UTC)
human nature has no black or white and one can be good and evil at the same time.
just like Sirius says in movie 5. :)

As for Tonks and Lupin, I reckon the death eater that Harry told Tonks was fighting Lupin-I forget his name- killed Remus, Tonks saw, and tried to kill said death eater but the death eater got her too.

And I thought she could have developed Draco much more too.
new age pirate[info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 01:50 pm (UTC)
Exactly. So much potential for developing interesting characters. Eg. Snape & Kreacher, both of which I adore now.

As for Tonks and Lupin, I reckon the death eater that Harry told Tonks was fighting Lupin-I forget his name- killed Remus, Tonks saw, and tried to kill said death eater but the death eater got her too. Something else I don't get. 2 powerful Order members were killed, and yet none of the other major characters (besides Fred) were touched. And Bellatrix was killed so easily too... I don't buy the whole angry!Molly business. The Death Eaters and Voldy, based on their apparent extent of power, seemed a little too lackadaisical for me. How can you take over the world when you're so careless?
(no subject) - [info]evespikey on July 22nd, 2007 02:07 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bunnyyyyy on July 22nd, 2007 02:15 pm (UTC) (Expand)
istderjemand[info]istderjemand on July 22nd, 2007 02:26 pm (UTC)
I agree with a lot of your points, especially the one concerning the Houses. Slytherin got served a very raw deal here. All through the books, we're told how mean and cruel and evil every Slytherin is. But, like you said, human nature isn't black or white. Even someone like Hitler had his good points, and this is a fact many people cannot bear to believe.

I had sincerely hoped that at least one, measly Slytherin student would have stayed to fight in the final battle! And, I really wanted Theodore Nott (<3) to make an appearance because we have been told that he thinks for himself. Of course, there was Slughorn, and one could include Snape as well, but no one else? They all just run off? Not realistic to me all. I am very disappointed.
Star I See[info]starisee on July 22nd, 2007 03:03 pm (UTC)
i fucking agree so damn much. I hated it. Maybe if I didn't feel like I was reading shit she just picked out of a hat and threw together to get us fans to shut up cause her muse was gone and she was sick of writing potter stories.

Or maybe I'm nuts.

I still say leave the epiloge shit to the lil fan-fic fucks.
Kaitlyn Says Bonjour[info]kreckless on July 22nd, 2007 03:17 pm (UTC)
well i know partially why there weren't as many deaths on harry's side near the end:

"I've done what my mother did. They're protected from you. Haven't you noticed how none of the spells you put on them are binding? You can't torture them. You can't touch them." p. 738 american edition.

soooo that accounts for some of the lack of deaths, harry essentially died for his entire side...then ressurected? whatevz.
[info]kadaj010 on July 23rd, 2007 02:48 pm (UTC)
Precisely what I thought. Plus, how come Harry's protection only lasted until he was 17 and while he lived with someone who had his mother's blood running through their veins (Petunia)?

Very believable.
(no subject) - [info]kreckless on July 23rd, 2007 09:57 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(Anonymous) on July 22nd, 2007 10:33 pm (UTC)
HP & TDH
I agree with the poster. I am glad I wasn't the only one disappointed. I didn't really like the "nineteen years later" part. I mean really, if your gonna do that, why not go ahead and tell where the main characters are working, who is still at Hogwarts, besides Neville...I just kept expecting some big shocking revelation and NOTHING...and come on, why didn't she, at least, give Umbridge the ending she deserved????? I think the book was very anitclimatic...
Jen: chickie[info]jeninmaine on July 23rd, 2007 03:33 pm (UTC)
I have been searching around all morning for people who felt the way I did about the book. Now we can all band together against the pitchfork-weilding mobs!

(Didn't that epilogue read like it was written like a teenage fanfic? Barf!)
Jen: chickie[info]jeninmaine on July 23rd, 2007 03:40 pm (UTC)
Oh, and, AND...

...I really hated all the "omg they're dead! oh wait they're not dead after all. oh wait, someone did die, but it was completely off camera ha ha!" bait-and-switch she kept playing, it tied directly in with all of the real-life hype and PR around the book built up before its release. I felt it was a really cheap trick and irritated the ever-loving CRAP out of me.

AND!

If they made "Voldemort" some sort of trace so anyone uttering it would instantly attract Barnum & Bailey's Death-Eater Circus right to their doorstep, why didn't they

a) Do this in Book 5;

and

b) Make "Dumbledore" a trace word? I mean, more people a la resistance are going to be saying that name rather than Voldemort's, I'd think. At least make em both hot buttons to cover all your bases!

Ok, better now.
( 57 spoilers — Spoil Us )